
Workplace absenteeism is, without a doubt, one of the major challenges in team management today, particularly in operational sectors such as hospitality.
However, treating absenteeism as a homogeneous phenomenon is a mistake.
There is a type of absenteeism that is unavoidable—arising from personal circumstances or health issues—which requires responsible, empathetic management aligned with the well-being of individuals.
But there is also another type of absenteeism, less visible and more complex to address: that which is linked to a lack of engagement, detachment, and attitudes that directly impact collective performance.
This form of absenteeism not only generates a significant economic cost, but also has an even more critical effect: team fatigue.
When part of the team does not respond, others take on the burden.
As a result, demotivation, frustration, and, in many cases, a loss of commitment begin to emerge.
For this reason, the real challenge for companies is not only to control absenteeism, but to understand it—and, above all, to differentiate it.
In this context, the role of leadership becomes essential. Beyond operational management, leaders must focus on building environments where people genuinely want to be involved.
This means working on motivation, recognition, communication, and professional development. But it also means making decisions.
Not everyone is at the same stage, nor do they share the same level of commitment. And not all situations should be treated in the same way.
This is where the distinction between two often-confused concepts becomes particularly relevant: goodwill-driven leniency and humanism.
Goodwill-driven leniency tends to justify behaviors and avoid conflict.
Humanism, on the other hand, involves understanding people while also acting responsibly towards the collective.
Because managing people is not only about support—it is also about protecting team balance and ensuring the sustainability of the project.
At COR, we understand that service quality begins with the values of the people behind it.
And that necessarily implies a conscious, demanding, and human approach to management.

